File #: 16-032    Version: Name:
Type: Ordinance Status: Adopted
File created: 1/15/2016 In control: City Council
On agenda: 2/9/2016 Final action: 2/9/2016
Title: Communication from the City Manager and Community Development Director with a Request to ADOPT an ORDINANCE Amending Chapter 5 and Chapter 32 of the CODE of the City of Peoria Pertaining to FINES for WORKING WITHOUT A BUILDING PERMIT and SELF-INSPECTION FORMS.
Indexes: Goal 1 - Financially Sound City , Goal 3 - Beautiful Peoria, Have an efficient government., Reinvest in neighborhoods
Attachments: 1. ORD NO 17,322 (16-032), 2. ORD NO 17,323 (16-032), 3. TMP-16-32, 4. TMP-16-32e
ACTION REQUESTED:
TITLE
Communication from the City Manager and Community Development Director with a Request to ADOPT an ORDINANCE Amending Chapter 5 and Chapter 32 of the CODE of the City of Peoria Pertaining to FINES for WORKING WITHOUT A BUILDING PERMIT and SELF-INSPECTION FORMS.

Body
BACKGROUND: In an effort to increase public safety and provide safeguards for residents, the Community Development Department continues to look for ways to strengthen ordinance language.

The proposed amendment strengthens language as it regards issuing a citation for working without a building permit and removes confusion as to whether a citation can be issued to a contractor hired by a property owner. On occasion, property owners are unaware their contractor did not pull a building permit. This change allows the City to cite the contractor as opposed to the property owner for failing to do so. The option to write the property owner a citation still exists, if appropriate. Additional language is added which allows the City to stop issuing building permits to contractors who are caught multiple times working without a building permit. The appeal and reinstatement process is also defined.

An additional flaw in the current language is that the prosecution process involves the Hearing Officer, as defined in Chapter 5 of the Code of the City of Peoria, Illinois. One aspect of this prosecution process states a viable defense is that the violation has been corrected. While often the goal is compliance, there is occasion where Staff feels conditions exist that warrant a fine for the initial offense. By strengthening the language and changing the prosecution process to what is identified in Chapter 32, property owners or contractors who do building work without a permit can be fined accordingly. These cases will be presented to the Administrative Hearing Officer who will determine what conditions existed at the time the citation was issued. A defense that the viol...

Click here for full text